| 1 |
Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture
|
|
|
|
In: Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 3; Pages: 544 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Automated Assessment of Glottal Dysfunction Through Unified Acoustic Voice Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0892-1997 ; Journal of Voice ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02987882 ; Journal of Voice, Elsevier, In press, ⟨10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.032⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Supraglottic Laryngectomy
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0023-852X ; Laryngoscope ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03230886 ; Laryngoscope, Wiley, 2021, 131 (5), pp.1060-1065. ⟨10.1002/lary.28926⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Acoustic analysis and measurements of distorted speech in the NZ population
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Acoustic analysis and measurements of distorted speech in the NZ population
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Acoustic analysis and measurements of distorted speech in the NZ population
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Common mental disorders and patient-reported swallowing disorders following total laryngectomy
|
|
|
|
In: Revista CEFAC, Vol 23, Iss 6 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Learning modern laryngeal surgery in a dissection laboratory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Integrated rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a pilot trial study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
A pneumatic bionic voice prosthesis : pre-clinical trials of controlling the voice onset and offset
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The Effects of Vocal Effort on Bilabial Contact Pressure and Intraoral Air Pressure, and Their Durations
|
|
|
|
In: Honors Theses at the University of Iowa (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Is the voicing-dependant duration of obstruents physiological in French?
|
|
|
|
In: 2nd Phonetics and Phonology in Europe Conference ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591412 ; 2nd Phonetics and Phonology in Europe Conference, Jun 2017, Cologne, Germany. 2017 ; http://pape2017.uni-koeln.de/ (2017)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; The relation between phonetic properties and phonological features has been the object of many theoretical suggestions which attempt to link the acoustic signal and linguistic representations. Phonetic redundancy and covariation in phonological contrasts are central points in this questioning. A correlation between consonant durations and voicing has been widely documented across many languages. The durational redundancy or covariation in voicing is largely seen as supported by a physiological substratum, e.g. an aerodynamic constraint on vocal vibration making voiced obstruents shorter. However other work, for example on French, has shown that the difference in obstruent duration according to underlying voicing feature resists complete voice assimilation and total devoicing, as in whispered speech, arguing for linguistic conditioning. Here, the physiological vs. phonological conditioning of voicing-dependant durations of French obstruents was tested by comparing five normal and pathological phonations differing in the nature of the phonatory organ and source for voicing (see Figure 1): (i) MODal voice, i.e. periodic laryngeal phonation; (ii) WHIspered voice, i.e. non-periodic laryngeal phonation; (iii) TUCker voice due to a partial laryngectomy, i.e. non-periodic laryngeal phonation; (iv) ESOphageal voice due to a complete laryngectomy, i.e. non-periodic non-laryngeal phonation produced by an aerodynamic excitation of the esophagus; (v) Pseudo-WHIspered voice due to complete laryngectomy and no use of esophagus, i.e. non-periodic supralaryngeal voice produced by an aerodynamic excitation of only the vocal tract. Acoustical durations were measured from 6 pairs of voiced-voiceless obstruents, i.e. /b-p/, /t-d/, /k-g/ and /f-v/, /s-z/, /ʃ-ʒ/ in initial (for fricatives), medial and word-final positions of isolated lexical words read in random ordered lists (one repetition). Table 1 reports information about speakers and data for each phonation type. Statistical effect of Voicing (voiced vs. voiceless) was tested by three-way ANOVAs with Voicing, Articulation (stop vs. fricative) and Lexical Position as the fixed effects (Table 1). The statistical comparisons between MOD and other phonations were stated on Voicing and Phonation interaction in two-ways ANOVAs included only the data for the same obstruents in the same lexical position. Reported here as a pilot study: one P-WHI speaker was analysed but not statically compared with MOD; the other one was excluded because of its total unintelligibility. In all phonation types and word positions, the underlying voiced stops or fricatives are significantly shorter than the phonological voiceless obstruents. Table 1 shows that the voicing-dependant difference is significantly preserved regardless of phonatory organ and acoustical source type, as is confirmed by the absence of Voicing*Phonation interactions for every comparison with the MOD condition. To neutralize the speaking rate variation between speakers and conditions, mean ratio durations across speakers were calculated as the duration difference, i.e. voiceless consonant duration minus voiced consonant duration, divided by the voiceless consonant duration. Figure 1 shows a gradual reduction increasing with the distance from the production mechanism of modal voice used by healthy subjects. However any clear boundary seems match the change of the phonatory organ (laryngeal vs. non laryngeal) or of the phonatory source (periodic vs. non-periodic). Moreover, although phonetically reduced, the ratio of durational differences of the underlying voicing contrast remains fairly large (around 0.3). The physiological conditioning therefore seems to have only a limited effect, since the duration contrast overcomes the various physical constraints of the different phonatory mechanisms. The resistance of voicing-dependant durations to laryngectomies argues for an encoding of the systematic phonetic information at a phonological level and/or for a " phonetic knowledge " component in the grammar.
|
|
Keyword:
[SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; laryngectomy; phonetics; phonology; segmental duration; voicing; whisper
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591412
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591412/file/2017_PaPE_poster_meynadier.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591412/document
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Acoustic analysis and computerized reconstruction of speech in laryngectomised individuals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Acoustic analysis and computerized reconstruction of speech in laryngectomised individuals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Acoustic analysis and computerized reconstruction of speech in laryngectomised individuals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Factors influencing clinical consistency and variability in voice prosthesis management
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Tracheoesophageal speech restoration: issues for training and clinical support
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Bionic voice (pilot study) : natural speech restoration for voice impaired individuals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Bionic voice (pilot study) : natural speech restoration for voice impaired individuals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
